| |
BGonline.org Forums
A possible correction for what you posted at 2+2
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?). (higonefive)
Date: Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
My developmental XG allows me to switch between XG1 and XG2 NN's so I can make comparisons and advise Xavier. Anyhow..with XGR+ on XG1 set to normal SI it misses the play that won the RO at 2+2, but with it set for huge SI it sees it.
Options/settings/analysis/SI to huge. I do this for all my match analysis..it is so fast anyhow.
Oh..and since you asked.. I'd just have made my 5 pt here, thinking it a bit better than other plays and certainly don't see why the play the won the 4 ply RO is slightly best (although if I spent a couple hours with it, maybe I would)
It is "safe" to make the 5 pt as it can't be far wrong and in very many similar positions will be clearly correct. This is a different situation that an opening play or response since those occur much more frequently than this oddity. (OK Holding games are very frequent, but a play like this much less so, IMO)
I won't be using XG2 to RO this out, as I have tasks I consider to be more important to devote my computers to.
.. neilkaz ..
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.