BGonline.org Forums
A possible correction for what you posted at 2+2
Posted By: Neil Robins
Date: Sunday, 6 March 2011, at 11:55 a.m.
In Response To: A possible correction for what you posted at 2+2 (neilkaz)
3-ply being sronger will only help if stuff gets at least evaluated at 3-ply. Yesterday I was looking at a game where three missed doubles by my opponent weren't picked up by XGR+ because it didn't look beyond 1-ply.
Messages In This Thread
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
higonefive -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 11:12 a.m.
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 11:40 a.m.
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
Stick -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 1:22 p.m.
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
Sebastiaan kuijs -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 2:43 p.m.
- A possible correction for what you posted at 2+2
neilkaz -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
- Where's the RO people are talking about? *NM*
Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 4:25 p.m.
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 4:34 p.m.
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 4:34 p.m.
- Curling up with a holding game (And Who Can Truthfully Claim He Would Have Gotten This Right?).
Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 5:20 p.m.
- Summing it up.
higonefive -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 6:32 p.m.
- gnuBG 3-ply (Grandmaster) rollout disagrees
Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 6 March 2011, at 6:04 p.m.
- Can we get a XGR+ RO?
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 7 March 2011, at 3:28 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.