BGonline.org Forums
Reasons for the Jacoby Rule
Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Thursday, 10 March 2011, at 10:33 p.m.
In Response To: Reasons for the Jacoby Rule (Phil Simborg)
Actually could be fun to play with Jacoby in matches as a side-event, and the impact would be much bigger than in money play.
Messages In This Thread
- Jacoby rule current usage
leobueno -- Tuesday, 8 March 2011, at 4:41 p.m.
- What actually IS the Jacoby Rule?
Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 8 March 2011, at 4:58 p.m.
- What actually IS the Jacoby Rule?
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 8 March 2011, at 5:03 p.m.
- The (potential) ambiguity
Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 8 March 2011, at 9:59 p.m.
- The (potential) ambiguity
Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 8 March 2011, at 10:46 p.m.
- An additional ambiguity
Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 12:38 a.m.
- An additional ambiguity
Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 3:28 a.m.
- An additional ambiguity
Stick -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 3:38 a.m.
- An additional ambiguity
Jake Jacobs -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 3:55 a.m.
- Apodictic?
Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 5:27 a.m.
- Apodictic?
Stick -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 5:38 a.m.
- Apodictic?
Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 5:50 a.m.
- purpose=stir up action
lenny -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 2:57 a.m.
- Jacoby rule current usage
Sebastiaan kuijs -- Wednesday, 9 March 2011, at 8:45 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.