[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

61P-42P-64Z-62H-32H-43@-64Z-41

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Wednesday, 30 March 2011, at 5:50 p.m.

In Response To: 61P-42P-64Z-62H-32H-43@-64Z-41 (Marty Storer)

140


1O ' '2O '5X4X2X ' ' '4O

' ' '2O2X4O '2O ' ' '2X

61P-42P-64Z-62H-32H-43@-64Z-41166


I think it's a matter of how far to carry the theme of extra contact. Obviously, I would hang back if White's back checkers were already escaped. Conversely, if we move Opp's anchor back to the 22pt instead of the 20pt, would you still eschew anchoring on the 20pt with 41? If not, then we must acknowledge that there is a crossover point (which it seems you judge to be further back than Opp's 20pt but I judge to be in Opp's outfield).

Sometimes it's a question of, "How much contact is enough?" I don't want to pass up a logical advancement of my back position and increased control of the outfield, however naive-looking, just to satisfy a contact-maximization-when-trailing theme.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.