| |
BGonline.org Forums
The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
Posted By: leobueno In Response To: The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG) (Timothy Chow)
Date: Tuesday, 19 April 2011, at 6:31 p.m.
The BQs I post are usually my blunders or positions which confuse or bewilder me (which happens consistently). Before posting, I typically run them by GNUbg at 4-ply analysis, and post when the bot's play seems--in this mediocre player's opinion--odd, goofy, interesting, incomprehensible, strange, etc.
Trying to improve my game, I greatly appreciate y'all's comments. Also, because my computing power is limited, I welcome rollouts which settle close play arguments, thus confirming or disproving the human analysis.
Like Tim, I try to use catchy titles to attract attention, but also to remind me of the position when I go back and look at the threads again, which I do from time to time.
I thought that by providing a hint as to the bot's play I would pique your curiosity and draw your analysis. Based on Tim and Chuck's comments (and others' when I first joined the group a couple of months' back), it looks like the hints have the opposite effect.
Tim, Chuck and others have convinced me that posting positions with less is more. I will change my approach accordingly, and will continue to be grateful for your insights.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.