BGonline.org Forums

The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)

Posted By: Stick
Date: Thursday, 21 April 2011, at 4:29 a.m.

In Response To: The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG) (Chuck Bower)

It's a nightmare when I agree with Chuck but it does happen. You can always add more information later, you can never retract information given to get an unbiased opinion. Post the problem with nothing attached and get people's thinking. If you don't get what you're after in the answers post a follow up with as much information as you like.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
  Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 19 April 2011, at 5:02 p.m.
  • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 19 April 2011, at 5:53 p.m.
    • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
      leobueno -- Tuesday, 19 April 2011, at 6:31 p.m.
      • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
        Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 20 April 2011, at 2:44 p.m.
        • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
          leobueno -- Thursday, 21 April 2011, at 4:01 p.m.
          • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
            Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 21 April 2011, at 4:43 p.m.
  • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
    Henrik Bukkjaer -- Wednesday, 20 April 2011, at 12:23 a.m.
  • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
    Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 20 April 2011, at 8:07 a.m.
  • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
    Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 20 April 2011, at 9:52 a.m.
  • There is a compromise solution
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 20 April 2011, at 2:24 p.m.
  • The case for minimizing (initial) information (LONG)
    Stick -- Thursday, 21 April 2011, at 4:29 a.m.