BGonline.org Forums
Nackgammon cube
Posted By: Turz
Date: Monday, 9 May 2011, at 4:40 p.m.
In Response To: Nackgammon cube (Casper van der Tak)
I would play 9/4* to prevent Blue from anchoring and gain more time to escape checkers.
Messages In This Thread
- Nackgammon cube
mtuhtan -- Sunday, 8 May 2011, at 4:44 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
christian munk-christensen -- Sunday, 8 May 2011, at 5:20 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 8 May 2011, at 5:52 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 8 May 2011, at 6:30 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
Mr Majestyk -- Sunday, 8 May 2011, at 8:27 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
Turz -- Monday, 9 May 2011, at 7:57 a.m.
- Nackgammon cube
neilkaz -- Monday, 9 May 2011, at 3:45 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 9 May 2011, at 4:04 p.m.
- Nackgammon cube
Turz -- Monday, 9 May 2011, at 4:40 p.m.
- (NG) 63R-61P-32@-54Q-41n-54K-52-44P-11K-4-61o-F-64D-F-C
Nack Ballard -- Monday, 9 May 2011, at 11:13 p.m.
- Waiting for more votes
mtuhtan -- Tuesday, 10 May 2011, at 6:17 a.m.
- Rollout and variants
mtuhtan -- Wednesday, 11 May 2011, at 2:59 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.