[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

53P-41S-66B-31?

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Thursday, 12 May 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

In Response To: 53P-41S-66B-31? (Nack Ballard)

"B (Both, 23/20 9/8) is not a play shown in either of your rollouts."

I rolled out this play at 0-ply but it was so far down the list that it didn't appear in the export. I was too lazy to change my export settings so I simply reported it. For clarity, I should have mentioned that.

I know you normally omit absolute equities from play decisions, because they usually irrelevant. However, part of my post compared rollout performance, and without absolute equities as a base line the nacbracs would not have been usable for comparison. The positioning of the equity with respect to the play letter ought to be consistent with cube decision nacbracs, but I can't find a reference post right now.

Is there a reason for not simply using one of [jsgbx] as a bot prefix? A default setting still be assumed or you could pre-pend a ply number. I would find this easier than remembering the unintuitive /<>^ etc. It would only cost 1 character per line. My rollout would then be:

53P-41S-66B-31
[-688 P c56 E63] 2g5
[-671 P c27 E39] 0g5*4
[-668 P c24 E47] 0ge

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.