BGonline.org Forums

nomenclature nitpick&question - OT

Posted By: Michael Petch
Date: Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 3:52 p.m.

In Response To: nomenclature nitpick&question - OT (Chuck Bower)

Chuck wrote: "Obviously you aren't doing something that a zillion other CS people do all the time, but in reality I do (sometimes) find this confusing. Even though the less confusing unit indicator is MB (MegaByte)"

I typed it up quick including all the typos. It was suppose to be MB. Although a CS guy like me might be inclined to use Base 2 (instead of 10) notation and express it as a mebibyte (MiB).

Messages In This Thread

• GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
  leobueno -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 1:34 a.m.
  • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
    Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 4:10 a.m.
    • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
      leobueno -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 11:24 a.m.
      • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
        Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 12:57 p.m.
    • nomenclature nitpick&question - OT
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 2:50 p.m.
      • nomenclature nitpick&question - OT
        eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 3:35 p.m.
      • nomenclature nitpick&question - OT
        Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 3:52 p.m.
  • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
    Philippe Michel -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 7:42 p.m.
    • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
      Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 8:47 p.m.
      • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
        Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 8:49 p.m.
    • Misread Philippes Comment - Additional Info
      Michael Petch -- Friday, 20 May 2011, at 12:14 a.m.