BGonline.org Forums

Misread Philippes Comment - Additional Info

Posted By: Michael Petch
Date: Friday, 20 May 2011, at 12:14 a.m.

In Response To: GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis (Philippe Michel)

Sorry, I originally misread this post. I was unaware Leo said he had Pruning Off (yes he probably should consider turning it on). Little lost in strength and a fair amount to be gained performance wise by having it on.

Ingo subtracted off the cache setup times before plotting the numbers. So they don't account for the increases at higher cache sizes that he observed.

Messages In This Thread

• GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
  leobueno -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 1:34 a.m.
  • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
    Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 4:10 a.m.
    • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
      leobueno -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 11:24 a.m.
      • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
        Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 12:57 p.m.
    • nomenclature nitpick&question - OT
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 2:50 p.m.
      • nomenclature nitpick&question - OT
        eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 3:35 p.m.
      • nomenclature nitpick&question - OT
        Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 3:52 p.m.
  • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
    Philippe Michel -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 7:42 p.m.
    • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
      Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 8:47 p.m.
      • GNUbg optimal cache size for analysis
        Michael Petch -- Thursday, 19 May 2011, at 8:49 p.m.
    • Misread Philippes Comment - Additional Info
      Michael Petch -- Friday, 20 May 2011, at 12:14 a.m.