BGonline.org Forums

why not 24-22 13-8 ?

Posted By: Frankie D
Date: Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 6:21 p.m.

In Response To: 21$-64R-54^-43P-52 (Carlo Melzi)

why not 24-22 13-8 and focus on getting a solid defensive posture ... especially with all these checkers in the opponent's home board (which is not yet developed.

Messages In This Thread

• 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
  Carlo Melzi -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 9:35 a.m.
  • 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
    Stick -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 9:49 a.m.
  • 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 2:46 p.m.
    • 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
      Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 3:56 p.m.
  • 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 2:37 a.m.
    • 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
      Carlo Melzi -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 4:45 a.m.
      • 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
        Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 5:52 p.m.
  • 21$-64K-54>-43P-52
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 5:30 a.m.
  • why not 24-22 13-8 ?
    Frankie D -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 6:21 p.m.
    • why not 24-22 13-8 ?
      neilkaz -- Friday, 3 June 2011, at 1:12 a.m.
      • why not 24-22 13-8 ?
        Nack Ballard -- Friday, 3 June 2011, at 2:59 a.m.
        • RO started *NM*
          neilkaz -- Friday, 3 June 2011, at 5:34 p.m.
          • RO continues as 3 plays are very close *NM*
            neilkaz -- Saturday, 4 June 2011, at 4:03 p.m.
  • RO TCTC
    neilkaz -- Monday, 6 June 2011, at 2:44 p.m.
    • GnuBG rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 7 June 2011, at 10:14 p.m.
      • GnuBG rollout
        Stick -- Wednesday, 8 June 2011, at 1:52 a.m.
      • GnuBG rollout
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 8 June 2011, at 7:06 p.m.