[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

The right way to measure which player played better in a match

Posted By: Henrik Bukkjaer
Date: Friday, 3 June 2011, at 1:09 a.m.

In Response To: The right way to measure which player played better in a match (Timothy Chow)

>> To summarize, if you show me just one match and you ask me who outplayed whom in this particular match and by how much, I would use MWC as the metric. If on the other hand you ask me which player is more likely to be the stronger player in general, then I would look at PR's measured in EMG.

Again, I agree - this must be the way to look at the numbers...

BUT: Beneath your conclusion lies an assumption that a player's errors are distributed randomly in a match. That's not necessarily true. You could have a player who errs early/late in a match, etc. Take a slow player playing a clocked match. He might get you an error rate of 5 on average. But typically, this would be 4 in the early games (where he can spend plenty of time), and then 6-7-8 in the late games, where he's under time pressure, and don't have enough time to do the needed pip-counts, etc. He'd be at a great disadvantage vs. a faster player who can play the same pace throughout the game with a constant error rate of 5. The slow player would err when it's more costly. Often loosing a lot of MWC.

A nervous player could be another example. When the cube goes 4, his PR goes sky-high! And even more realistic would be players who starts to err on their cube dicisions, once the cube goes up. Eg. they double just a tad later when it's a 4-ball lying in their drawer - they want to be sure before turning it to 8. Missing doubles at a certain PR-price, is much more costly on 4-cubes then initial ones. Except for when looking at the PR. And conservative takers, who drop maybe a little too much when the stuff goes volatile - the risk averse players - will often tend to exhibit that behavior more when the price goes up. Costing even more MWC than the PR would suggest.

These are examples of error-types that will give an incorrect PR even in the long run because their MWC losses comes at certain patterns which PR by itøs nature will polish out....

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.