BGonline.org Forums
why not 24-22 13-8 ?
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Friday, 3 June 2011, at 1:12 a.m.
In Response To: why not 24-22 13-8 ? (Frankie D)
I wonder that also, since I slightly prefer this play to hitting loose on the ace pt with a 1 pt board and only 7 forward checkers. After 24/22 13/8 we are likely to come up with a good anchor somewhere and not have to worry about a blotted ace pt.
Messages In This Thread
- 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
Carlo Melzi -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 9:35 a.m.
- 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
Stick -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 9:49 a.m.
- 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 1 June 2011, at 2:46 p.m.
- 21$-64R-54^-43P-52
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 2:37 a.m.
- 21$-64K-54>-43P-52
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 5:30 a.m.
- why not 24-22 13-8 ?
Frankie D -- Thursday, 2 June 2011, at 6:21 p.m.
- why not 24-22 13-8 ?
neilkaz -- Friday, 3 June 2011, at 1:12 a.m.
- RO TCTC
neilkaz -- Monday, 6 June 2011, at 2:44 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.