BGonline.org Forums

Was the match score relevant?

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 7:22 a.m.

In Response To: Perry's position (Perry Gartner)

For money, pointing looks clear because you win outright on the dancing numbers and are clearly ahead on the others.

If Jim and Falafel were discussing, I think the match score must have been an issue. If you cannot use the cube and/or the value of gammons won is impaired, pointing may become less clear. DMP, for example, I think 21/11 would be best.

Messages In This Thread

• Perry's position
  adambulldog -- Wednesday, 15 June 2011, at 10:30 p.m.
  • Perry's position
    Lucas Bauer -- Wednesday, 15 June 2011, at 11:24 p.m.
  • 64R-52D-31U-32K-2-53E-64R-64
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 15 June 2011, at 11:36 p.m.
    • 43Z-62H-55M-65R-63H-21J-64
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 2:11 a.m.
      • 43Z-62H-55M-65R-63H-21R-64
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 4:06 a.m.
  • Perry's position
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 15 June 2011, at 11:40 p.m.
    • Perry's position
      Perry Gartner -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 1:56 a.m.
      • Was the match score relevant?
        Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 7:22 a.m.
        • Was the match score relevant?
          Stick -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 9:52 a.m.
          • Was the match score relevant?
            Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 10:38 a.m.
            • Rollout at dmp
              Rollouts R' Us -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 6:57 p.m.
              • Rollout at dmp
                Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 7:25 p.m.
  • Perry's position
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 1:15 a.m.
  • Perry's position
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 3:14 a.m.
  • Perry's position
    garyo -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 7:20 a.m.
  • Perry's position
    Stick -- Thursday, 16 June 2011, at 9:50 a.m.