BGonline.org Forums

65R-21, and 65R-21S-31P-54

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Saturday, 2 July 2011, at 1:21 a.m.

In Response To: Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63 (Turz)

I would have played 65R-21$ and 65R-21S-31P-54D.

Agreed. 65R-21 is [$ S26]a for money, plus there's a 𣯚 score deficit to consider; S (Split, 24/23 13/11) is lame.

I'm less certain about 65R-21S-31P-54. I am inclined to play D (Down, 13/9 13/8) as you did, or maybe S (Split, 23/18 13/9). R (Run, 23/14), as played, seems tame though probably not far wrong.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
  Paul Weaver -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 10:02 a.m.
  • Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
    Stick -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 10:21 a.m.
  • Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
    Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 10:24 a.m.
    • Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
      Stick -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 10:27 a.m.
      • Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
        Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 10:38 a.m.
  • Tricky 5th Roll 63: 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
    Turz -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 11:08 a.m.
    • 65R-21, and 65R-21S-31P-54
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 2 July 2011, at 1:21 a.m.
  • 65R-21S-31P-54R-63
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 2 July 2011, at 1:17 a.m.
  • XG Eval Posted
    Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 2 July 2011, at 2:17 a.m.