BGonline.org Forums

Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62

Posted By: Stick
Date: Monday, 4 January 2010, at 9:46 p.m.

In Response To: Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62 (Nack Ballard)

The sequence was:

51S-21S-62R-32D-41H-51H-61R-217-62H-51H-63H-53H-55R-65R-62?

A couple things of note about the nactation of the underlined plays, correct me if I go astray. First, the 62R is running from the 23pt whereas 62r would be running from the 24pt.

The 217 falls back on old school notation for me and it is how I'd record it OtB. I do not know if there's a better way to nactate this but I'm positive 7 is what I would use. If we assume the player doesn't make the best play, @, then we could assume the hit portion of the play and then nactate them according to how the two is played but I prefer *7* here.

Lastly, the 55. With this play we assume the defensive bar point anchor is made and then have to choose how to play the other two fives. I would see the two candidate plays as R which runs the back checker around to the 10pt and P which would make the 3pt.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62
  Stick -- Monday, 4 January 2010, at 1:38 a.m.
  • Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62
    John O'Hagan -- Monday, 4 January 2010, at 3:09 a.m.
  • Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 4 January 2010, at 9:27 p.m.
    • Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62
      Stick -- Monday, 4 January 2010, at 9:46 p.m.
  • Tokyo Permabox #6 - 62
    Rich Munitz -- Monday, 4 January 2010, at 10:33 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 1:54 a.m.
    • Rollout
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 5:28 p.m.