BGonline.org Forums

54-split, 63-run, 31

Posted By: Tom Keith
Date: Wednesday, 27 July 2011, at 7:18 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Rollouts at Match Scores (leobueno)

The Nactation used in the book is not the "short-form" Nactation you are used to seeing in this forum; rather, it's "long-form" nactation, which is almost like English. For example, the caption to position A102 is "54-split, 63-run, 31". You can probably understand this already, but if you can't it doesn't matter. Just look at the diagram and ask yourself "How should I play a 3-1 roll?" (Every problem in the book is a 3-1 roll.)

Btw, how would you play 3-1 in this position, which diagrammed here:

Messages In This Thread

• Rollouts at Match Scores
  RobertFontaine -- Thursday, 31 August 2006, at 4:55 p.m.
  • Re: Rollouts at Match Scores
    Stick -- Friday, 22 September 2006, at 6:36 p.m.
    • Re: Rollouts at Match Scores
      leobueno -- Wednesday, 27 July 2011, at 1:08 p.m.
      • Re: Rollouts at Match Scores
        Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 27 July 2011, at 4:45 p.m.
        • Corrected Link to Ballard/Weaver Book
          Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 27 July 2011, at 4:49 p.m.
        • Re: Rollouts at Match Scores
          leobueno -- Wednesday, 27 July 2011, at 6:20 p.m.
          • 54-split, 63-run, 31
            Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 27 July 2011, at 7:18 p.m.
          • Re: Rollouts at Match Scores
            Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 28 July 2011, at 12:06 a.m.