[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Methinks Nack meant W = Wild (24/21 6/4).

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Thursday, 12 January 2012, at 7:26 a.m.

In Response To: 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32: Data summary (Nack Ballard)

Insignificant Correction

Maybe if you move your checkers like Alvaro Savio does in the first 75 seconds of this YouTube video, you can play W = Wild (24/21 13/4).

Methinks Nack meant 24/21, 6/4.

Note: Leo Bueno first posted a link to this video from the 2007 Monte Carlo finals back in September 2011.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.