I made a variance on example 3-13 just in case some one recognises some similarities.In one example I put 2 checkers from the 6 point on the 5 point that made no difference and the one I shown on the 9/16 point. with a 32 to play.
Now the theme is connectivity , suggesting that you should come up. But what what would be the candidates here and why , keeping the theme in mind as 2 rolls that are real close yet seem to differ in approach. If anyone has input on the variance of example 3-13.
| 1. | XG Roller++ | 24/22 24/21 | eq: -0,082 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 48,08% (G:14,27% B:0,73%)
51,92% (G:17,32% B:0,79%) | |
|
| 2. | XG Roller++ | 24/21 13/11 | eq: -0,154 (-0,072) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 46,15% (G:14,57% B:0,83%)
53,85% (G:17,83% B:1,03%) | |
|
| 3. | XG Roller++ | 13/8 | eq: -0,160 (-0,078) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 45,28% (G:14,46% B:0,85%)
54,72% (G:16,05% B:0,81%) | |
|
| 4. | XG Roller++ | 8/5 7/5 | eq: -0,170 (-0,088) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 45,03% (G:15,58% B:0,84%)
54,97% (G:16,34% B:0,98%) | |
|
| 5. | XG Roller++ | 24/21 8/6 | eq: -0,176 (-0,093) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 45,72% (G:13,38% B:0,76%)
54,28% (G:17,34% B:0,59%) | |
|
