I do not know what seed was used.
here is the raw data i got from FRank Berger, who extracted the Gnu BG Ro of the initial study:
[benchPosition]
[cubeDecision]false[/cubeDecision]
[id]141702G[/id]
[positionID]zJ3gATCMn4MBMA:cIkJANAAEAAA[/positionID]
[xgID]XGID=-b-B--F-C---dB---a-cc-b-B-:0:0:1:23:2:13:1:0:10[/xgID]
[responses]
[response]
[move]8-3[/move]
[equityDiff]0.000[/equityDiff]
[/response]
[response]
[move]6-4,6-3[/move]
[equityDiff]-0.021[/equityDiff]
[/response]
[response]
[move]13-11,13-10[/move]
[equityDiff]-0.057[/equityDiff]
[/response]
[/responses]
[/benchPosition]
Note: replace the bracket by < and > to get proper XML
here is the XG RO (note the 19K RO it took to get to 0.005 CI)
Maybe Micheal or Frank can post the initial Gnu BG RO.
Surely 6/4 6/3 is not what i would have played OTB.
| | White is Snowie4
score: 30 pip: 147 | Unlimited Game Jacoby | pip: 140 score: 11
Blue is gnubg | |
XGID=-b-B-CC-A---bD---c-f--b-B-:0:0:-1:32:30:11:1:0:10 |
Blue to play 32 |
1. | Rollout1 | 6/4 6/3 | eq: -0.6920 |
| Player: Opponent: | 34.19% (G:10.62% B:0.71%) 65.81% (G:25.20% B:1.83%) | Conf.: ±0.0050 (-0.6970...-0.6870) - [100.0%] Duration: 1 hour 06 minutes |
|
2. | Rollout2 | 13/11 13/10 | eq: -0.7479 (-0.0559) |
| Player: Opponent: | 32.39% (G:10.34% B:0.78%) 67.61% (G:22.99% B:1.78%) | Conf.: ±0.0050 (-0.7529...-0.7429) - [0.0%] Duration: 1 hour 03 minutes |
|
3. | Rollout3 | 8/3 | eq: -0.7609 (-0.0688) |
| Player: Opponent: | 32.75% (G:9.55% B:0.65%) 67.25% (G:24.37% B:1.31%) | Conf.: ±0.0050 (-0.7659...-0.7559) - [0.0%] Duration: 48 minutes 37 seconds |
|
|
1 19981 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 19764 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
3 16632 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.02