By coincidence(?), just after making the above post yesterday, I played the worst match (PR-wise) that I've ever recorded. It was a seven-pointer against XG, lasting four games. My PR's for the four games, according to "world class" analysis, were 4.2, 2.1, 1.0, and 49.7! Overall PR 14.7. Here are the highlights of that fourth game for your amusement.
| | White is eXtremeGammon
score: 3 pip: 117 | 7 point match | pip: 147 score: 2
Blue is Timothy Chow | |
XGID=-----CCaB---cF-a-b-dA-bb--:0:0:-1:00:2:3:0:7:10 |
White on roll, cube action? |
Analyzed in XG Roller+ |
Player Winning Chances: | 74.92% (G: 23.77% B: 0.25%) |
Opponent Winning Chances: | 25.08% (G: 4.15% B: 0.18%) |
|
Cubeless Equities |
No Double: | +0.767 |
Double: | +1.958 |
|
Cubeful Equities |
No Double: | +0.912 (-0.088) |
Double/Take: | +1.594 (+0.594) |
Double/Drop: | +1.000 |
|
Best Cube action: Double / Drop |
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
My brain told me, "The race isn't that bad," in effect parsing the position as something like the one below, and I evaluated it as a bare take. (I turn off pip count when playing against XG. If I had actually bothered to count pips, or even estimate the race, I'm sure I would have dropped.)
| | White is Player 2
score: 3 pip: 117 | 7 point match | pip: 135 score: 2
Blue is Player 1 | |
XGID=-----CDaC---cD-a-b-dA-bb--:0:0:-1:00:2:3:0:7:10 |
White on roll, cube action? |
Analyzed in XG Roller+ |
Player Winning Chances: | 68.57% (G: 17.09% B: 0.18%) |
Opponent Winning Chances: | 31.43% (G: 5.06% B: 0.21%) |
|
Cubeless Equities |
No Double: | +0.544 |
Double: | +1.406 |
|
Cubeful Equities |
No Double: | +0.732 (-0.268) |
Double/Take: | +1.012 (+0.012) |
Double/Drop: | +1.000 |
|
Best Cube action: Double / Drop |
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
| | White is eXtremeGammon
score: 3 pip: 98 | 7 point match | pip: 125 score: 2
Blue is Timothy Chow | |
XGID=---a-CD-BB--bD----abbbcb--:1:1:1:22:2:3:0:7:10 |
Blue to play 22 |
1. | XG Roller+ | 13/11(2) 6/4(2) | eq: +0.933 |
| Player: Opponent: | 66.12% (G:4.56% B:0.10%) 33.88% (G:5.43% B:0.07%) | |
|
2. | XG Roller+ | 9/3* 5/3 | eq: +0.323 (-0.609) |
| Player: Opponent: | 52.61% (G:4.60% B:0.09%) 47.39% (G:10.30% B:0.11%) | |
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
An especially egregious example of my undervaluing priming versus attacking.
| | White is eXtremeGammon
score: 3 pip: 81 | 7 point match | pip: 81 score: 2
Blue is Timothy Chow | |
XGID=-ABBaBD-BaB--------bbbbcb-:1:1:1:54:2:3:0:7:10 |
Blue to play 54 |
1. | XG Roller+ | 6/2 6/1 | eq: +0.902 |
| Player: Opponent: | 70.43% (G:1.59% B:0.02%) 29.57% (G:0.39% B:0.01%) | |
|
2. | XG Roller+ | 8/4* 6/1 | eq: +0.438 (-0.464) |
| Player: Opponent: | 65.55% (G:18.71% B:0.40%) 34.45% (G:13.05% B:0.15%) | |
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
The opposite error from the first position: I counted pips, noted my blot, and convinced myself to hold the cube. This is a massive redouble even for money. And then I played the checkers as if my opponent had the cube.
By the way, XG then proceeded to hit both of my blots and win a gammon. The punishment fit the crime.