BGonline.org Forums

31 for White

Posted By: Stick
Date: Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 1:45 p.m.

In Response To: 31 for White (John O'Hagan)

I'm not sure how much equity the bot will quote as being at stake here but the concept is important. 3/2 should be a next in my opinion for reasons stated by Joe & Mike.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• 31 for White
  John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 2:06 a.m.
  • 31 for White
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 3:06 a.m.
  • 31 for White
    Joe Freedman -- Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 3:08 a.m.
  • 31 for White
    Stick -- Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 1:45 p.m.
  • 31 for White
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 5:05 p.m.
  • 31 for White
    ah_clem -- Wednesday, 24 April 2013, at 6:50 p.m.
    • 31 for White
      John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 25 April 2013, at 4:17 a.m.
      • 31 for White
        ah_clem -- Thursday, 25 April 2013, at 2:47 p.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 25 April 2013, at 4:57 a.m.