BGonline.org Forums

thanks Stick

Posted By: Michael Nielsen
Date: Saturday, 7 December 2013, at 12:45 a.m.

In Response To: thanks Stick (onur alan)

Nack mentions the duplication of 2's as the main reason for S being close against 21S, 32S and 62S. I don't feel like linking to it since I'm on my phone, but do a search for 21S-53 and it will come up.

Messages In This Thread

• 21S 53?
  bob koca -- Friday, 1 February 2008, at 5:18 a.m.
  • 21S 53?
    Stick -- Friday, 1 February 2008, at 5:59 a.m.
    • 21S 53?
      bob koca -- Friday, 1 February 2008, at 6:47 a.m.
      • 21S 53?
        Ian Shaw -- Friday, 1 February 2008, at 11:43 a.m.
    • 21S 53?
      neilkaz -- Saturday, 2 February 2008, at 7:25 p.m.
    • 21S 53?
      onur alan -- Friday, 6 December 2013, at 5:57 p.m.
      • 21S 53?
        Stick -- Friday, 6 December 2013, at 6:40 p.m.
        • thanks Stick
          onur alan -- Saturday, 7 December 2013, at 12:03 a.m.
          • thanks Stick
            Michael Nielsen -- Saturday, 7 December 2013, at 12:45 a.m.
            • thanks Stick
              Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 7 December 2013, at 8:59 a.m.
              • thanks Micheal and Mike
                onur alan -- Saturday, 7 December 2013, at 10:00 a.m.
                • thanks Micheal and Mike
                  Michael Nielsen -- Saturday, 7 December 2013, at 1:42 p.m.