|
BGonline.org Forums
Is it...? Interesting chequer decision from Mochy/Falafel Doubles Match
Posted By: Rod In Response To: Interesting chequer decision from Mochy/Falafel Doubles Match (Michael Petch)
Date: Friday, 13 December 2013, at 12:37 p.m.
Why was this position "interesting"?
From a play standpoint it is anything but interesting.
So is it because Mochy was going to make a blunder? Perhaps that makes it interesting, but not to me. I'm sure Mochy's errors and their magnitudes fit nicely on a bell curve, just like mine, except my curve is going to be a lot fatter than his.
I wish I could play as strongly as XG Mobile (0.47 PR). But I catch it making 0.100 errors frequently when I enter positions and as much as a 0.200 error in the last 2 weeks. In money play sessions in the last 2 weeks I've seen (and bet) on blunders as large as 0.350 from top-10 (in my estimation) players during $ game sessions (I've played $ sessions with 4 of the top-10, so there remains anonymity :-) ). So what? They all still outplay me. But not a single one of the blunders were interesting positions.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the fact that Mochy was considering a blunder makes a position interesting... Anyone?
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.