This came form the Monte Carlo World champs this year and I do not understand why 5/2 is not the better play
1. | Rollout1 | 5/3 4/3 | eq: -0.954 |
| Player: Opponent: | 20.20% (G:9.68% B:1.00%) 79.80% (G:0.00% B:0.00%) | Conf.: ± 0.015 (-0.969...-0.939) - [91.5%] Duration: 5 minutes 51 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 5/2 | eq: -0.968 (-0.014) |
| Player: Opponent: | 19.75% (G:10.26% B:1.16%) 80.25% (G:0.00% B:0.00%) | Conf.: ± 0.013 (-0.980...-0.955) - [8.5%] Duration: 5 minutes 32 seconds |
|
3. | XG Roller++ | 4/3 4/2 | eq: -1.000 (-0.046) |
| Player: Opponent: | 18.30% (G:8.72% B:0.65%) 81.70% (G:0.00% B:0.00%) | |
|
4. | XG Roller++ | 5/4 5/3 | eq: -1.000 (-0.046) |
| Player: Opponent: | 16.98% (G:6.41% B:0.51%) 83.02% (G:0.00% B:0.00%) | |
|
|
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|