BGonline.org Forums

Exception to 55P rule? - 53P-55P-65

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 18 April 2014, at 5:16 p.m.

In Response To: Exception to 55P rule? - 53P-55P-65 (Stick)

Stick wrote:

Maybe Nack has a strict definition of the word 'separate' that doesn't include running to safety?

No, I'm sure that's not the case. A major purpose of the rule is to steer you towards plays such as 31P-55P-65D which are highly counterintuitive to most people who haven't been bottle-fed by the bots.

If 65R is correct here then it's an exception.

Messages In This Thread

• Exception to 55P rule?
  Timothy Chow -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 2:49 p.m.
  • Exception to 55P rule? - 53P-55P-65
    Stick -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 3:18 p.m.
    • Exception to 55P rule? - 53P-55P-65
      Stick -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 3:38 p.m.
      • Exception to 55P rule? - 53P-55P-65
        Timothy Chow -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 5:16 p.m.
  • Exception to 55P rule?
    neilkaz -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 4:02 p.m.
  • 53P-55P-65 Rollout
    Stick -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 5:37 p.m.
    • 53P-55P-65 — No Jacoby, No Beavers — 3-ply XG2 Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 8:48 p.m.
  • Exception to 55P rule?
    Nack Ballard -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 5:46 p.m.
    • 52D-55P-62 — Unlimited Games — 3-ply XG2 Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 18 April 2014, at 9:00 p.m.
    • Link to the updated 55P / 44P rule
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 22 April 2014, at 5:00 a.m.