|
BGonline.org Forums
xg vs gnubg containment position
Posted By: eXtreme Gammon In Response To: xg vs gnubg containment position (Ian Dunstan)
Date: Thursday, 31 July 2014, at 5:20 p.m.
There is a difference between GnuBG cubeless RO and XG's.
In GnuBG it basically assume the cube cannot be turn and will play checker play accordingly.
In XG, it knows the cube can be used and will play the checker accordingly, but it will never double.
To make a comparison you need to set the position (not the RO) as cubeless via the menu "setup>>Maximum cube value>>cubeless", then you can pick any RO setting you want.
White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 158Unlimited Game pip: 72
score: 0
Blue is Player 1XGID=bEDD----------bbbbbc---AA-:0:0:-1:65:0:0:0:0:0 White to play 65
1. Rollout1 Bar/20 Bar/19 eq: +0.771
Player:
Opponent:79.57% (G:22.27% B:0.86%)
20.43% (G:5.09% B:0.03%)Conf.: ± 0.027 (+0.744...+0.799)
Duration: 3 minutes 10 seconds1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG RollereXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.206.pre-release
As containment is surely a weakness of XG2 here is a RO with the verison 3 engine that is in development
White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 158Unlimited Game pip: 72
score: 0
Blue is Player 1XGID=bEDD----------bbbbbc---AA-:0:0:-1:65:0:0:0:0:0 White to play 65
1. Rollout1 Bar/20 Bar/19 eq: +0.815
Player:
Opponent:80.95% (G:23.21% B:0.82%)
19.05% (G:4.45% B:0.01%)Conf.: ± 0.019 (+0.796...+0.834)
Duration: 2 minutes 30 seconds1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
eXtreme Gammon Version: 3 alpha
It is interesting to see the CI went down significantly, showing the new engine has a much better idea of how to handle these positions
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.