BGonline.org Forums

Is XG right here? Prime v Prime

Posted By: Stick
Date: Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 8:04 a.m.

In Response To: Is XG right here? Prime v Prime (Casper Van der Tak)

That sounds pretty much correct. It seems inherent in the definition of the phrase 'prime v. prime' to me.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
  Mike Clapsadle -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 4:28 a.m.
  • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
    Stick -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 4:58 a.m.
    • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
      christian munk-christensen -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 7:21 a.m.
      • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
        Stick -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 7:32 a.m.
        • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
          Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 7:53 a.m.
          • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
            Stick -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 8:04 a.m.
            • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
              Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 10:00 a.m.
  • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
    Keene -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 4:59 p.m.
  • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 6:05 p.m.
    • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime
      Mike Clapsadle -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 11:16 p.m.
  • Is XG right here? Prime v Prime --- XGR+ RO
    Petter Bengtsson -- Wednesday, 11 February 2015, at 9:03 p.m.
  • recube efficiency?
    garyo -- Thursday, 12 February 2015, at 12:26 a.m.