BGonline.org Forums
2nd anchor or blocking point, Variant Position
Posted By: John O'Hagan
Date: Sunday, 21 June 2015, at 12:42 p.m.
In Response To: 2nd anchor or blocking point, Variant Position (Nack Ballard)
If you cover the 9-point in Nack's altered position, the only bad roll for White is 51. In my original position, covering the 9 makes 65,53, and 51 all weak numbers for White. That's probably enough to swing the decision to making the 2nd anchor in Nack's position.
Messages In This Thread
- 2nd anchor or a good blocking point?
John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 20 June 2015, at 4:36 p.m.
- 2nd anchor or a good blocking point?
Sean Garber -- Saturday, 20 June 2015, at 5:58 p.m.
- 2nd anchor or a good blocking point?
Fatboy -- Saturday, 20 June 2015, at 6:19 p.m.
- 2nd anchor or a good blocking point?
Colin Owen -- Saturday, 20 June 2015, at 11:08 p.m.
- 2nd anchor or blocking point, Variant Position
Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 21 June 2015, at 1:13 a.m.
- OTB & RO
John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 21 June 2015, at 8:23 p.m.
- OTB & RO
Colin Owen -- Monday, 22 June 2015, at 1:24 a.m.
- OTB & RO
Stick -- Monday, 22 June 2015, at 3:50 a.m.
- OTB & RO
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 23 June 2015, at 3:33 a.m.
- OTB & RO
Colin Owen -- Tuesday, 23 June 2015, at 10:01 a.m.
- OTB & RO
Fatboy -- Tuesday, 23 June 2015, at 4:10 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.