BGonline.org Forums

OLM Sa 01/09/10

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 9:12 p.m.

In Response To: OLM Sa 01/09/10 (Ian Shaw)

Ian Shaw wrote:

We can combine 24/23 with either 6/4 or 13/11 (which duplicates 6 to hit). Getting a second man sent back would be bad, so I think 24/23 13/11 is superior

I'm confused by your reasoning. If getting a second man sent back would be bad, wouldn't 24/23 6/4 be superior because it doesn't create a new blot?

Messages In This Thread

• OLM Sa 01/09/10
  Jason Lee -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 5:59 a.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 11:58 a.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    Ian Shaw -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 2:16 p.m.
    • OLM Sa 01/09/10
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 9:12 p.m.
      • OLM Sa 01/09/10
        Ian Shaw -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 3:07 p.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    Seth -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 3:23 p.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    neilkaz -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 3:47 p.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 6:46 p.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    MandM1951 -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    garyo -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 4:56 a.m.
  • OLM Sa 01/09/10
    Jason Lee -- Tuesday, 12 January 2010, at 8:22 p.m.