BGonline.org Forums

21$-21

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 2:51 p.m.

In Response To: 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results (neilkaz)

Another great choice of rollouts Neil. This should be very interesting. I would normally suspect that GNU is overvaluing $ and S will prove to be best. 21$-51 is S of course. However, both GNU and Snowie value 21$ the same after 21$. They disagree on S. I'll guess S is best by a very small amount.

Messages In This Thread

• 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
  neilkaz -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 12:22 a.m.
  • 21$-21
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 2:51 p.m.
    • 21$-21 after about 4500
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 3:54 p.m.
    • 21$-21
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 20 January 2010, at 4:54 a.m.
      • Insignificant Correction: 21$-21 Data
        Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 15 September 2011, at 6:12 a.m.
  • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
    Andreas -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 5:51 p.m.
  • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
    Keene -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 6:05 p.m.
    • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 6:13 p.m.
      • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
        Keene -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 8:20 p.m.