[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Excessive criticism?

Posted By: storm
Date: Saturday, 10 April 2010, at 10:28 p.m.

In Response To: Excessive criticism? (Matt Cohn-Geier)

Since you mention Neil's Numbers I am assuming your MET was Woolsey's. This seems to be an example where a take/pass decision will potentially be killed by using Neil's Numbers rather than the memorized table. Calculating the näive takepoint firstly without adjusting using the gammonprice on a 4-cube results in approx. either 21.9% or 26.7%(!) depending on wether one uses the entries in the table or Neil's Numbers with the resulting fractional parts. I don't know the World's recube efficiency but using 50% then gives 18% and 21.8% when DK has a takepoint on approx 35.5% on the 8-cube. A huge difference stemming from using the approximation of the MET.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.