| |
BGonline.org Forums
Snowie rollout
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Snowie rollout (Nack Ballard)
Date: Wednesday, 28 September 2011, at 1:05 a.m.
I haven’t yet figured out how to include normal-looking text (non-centered on a white background) in the same post as a Snowie rollout, so I posted the latter separately.
Busted R4
This turns out to be a position for which using a live cube makes a big difference in the rollout result. Our original Snowie result (documented before the underlying file was lost) was [V B6 @44] ~10*2, Janowski-cube-adjusted (where V = 24/21(3) 21/18, B = 24/21(2) 13/10(2), @ = 24/18(2)). No live cube was used.
Consistent with that, the new Snowie rollout result I just posted is [V B9 @43] ~10, Janowski-cube-adjusted. However, if you know how to read between the lines, you’ll see that the live cube result is [@ V1 B1] ~10. That live cube result is similar to the GnuBG and XG live cube rollout results recently posted.
At the time (2006), we confirmed that @ was also not a competitive play in a money rollout done on GnuBG (by Stick). However, unbeknownst to Stick, Paul and myself, the GnuBG version 14.3 devel was corrupt, and just happened to downgrade @ for money, while showing V and/or B to be the best play, yet at the same time the rollout results at the other three scores were apparently not corrupt. More details can be read here. In short, the circumstances leading to this position being represented in publication as an R4 were the consequence of an unusual, unlucky parlay.
The happy ending is that adjusting the placement of two spares gives us this legitimate R4.
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.