BGonline.org Forums

54 to play: Rollouts (Cube based play reversal)

Posted By: Fabrice Liardet
Date: Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 10:00 a.m.

In Response To: 54 to play: Rollouts (Cube based play reversal) (Jeremy Bagai)

If hit/flunk overshoots our market by miles (which seems to be the case at that score) and the two options would be close in equity with a turned cube, then it logically follows that getting those overshoots capped at 1.0 will significantly decrease the equity of the hitting move in the centered cube case.

Which people usually summary as the rule of thumb "if you are close to cashing, don't jack up the volatility".

Messages In This Thread

• 54 to play
  Jeremy Bagai -- Sunday, 2 October 2011, at 10:06 p.m.
  • 54 to play
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 2 October 2011, at 11:33 p.m.
  • 54 to play
    Stick -- Monday, 3 October 2011, at 12:08 a.m.
  • 54 to play: Rollouts (Cube based play reversal)
    Jeremy Bagai -- Monday, 3 October 2011, at 9:10 a.m.
    • 54 to play: Rollouts (Cube based play reversal)
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 3 October 2011, at 2:24 p.m.
    • 54 to play: Rollouts (Cube based play reversal)
      Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 10:00 a.m.