BGonline.org Forums

52S-xxx-62

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 10:41 a.m.

In Response To: 52S-xxx-62 (Dmitriy Obukhov)

Thanks, Dmitriy, for getting this going. Here are the answers I chose before reading the rest of the thread:

52S-11e-62S — I don't want to try 62Z into a double shot. 62R can't be too bad either.

52S-31P-62Z — Taking a hint from Nack, I'll try 62Z when the back checkers are not split.

52S-42P-62Z — Thank you for your previous rollout.

52S-44B-62Z — Running would be racing. When behind, don't race.

52S-51S-62S — As much as would like to make an anchor, I don't want to slot into a double shot.

52S-61P-62Z — I'll make the anchor. An asset is an asset.

52S-62R-62Z — I like the idea of trying to prime or attack a lone back man

52S-65R-62Z — I like the idea of trying to prime or attack a lone back man

Mike

P.S. I'm a little shy about posting amid the giants, so...

Shake it, shake it Sugaree
Just don't tell them that you know me

– Garcia/Hunter

Messages In This Thread

• 52S-xxx-62
  Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 8:47 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 1:52 a.m.
    • 52S-xxx-62
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 4:48 p.m.
      • 52S-xxx-62
        Tommy Nesbakk -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 7:48 a.m.
        • 52S-xxx-62
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 12:33 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 10:41 a.m.
  • I remember...
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 12:42 a.m.
    • I remember...
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 3:34 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62 ***RO***
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 8:12 a.m.
    • 52S-xxx-62, Summary
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 2:30 p.m.
      • 52S-52S-62 ***RO***
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Saturday, 19 November 2011, at 7:38 p.m.