BGonline.org Forums

52S-xxx-62

Posted By: Tommy Nesbakk
Date: Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 7:48 a.m.

In Response To: 52S-xxx-62 (Nack Ballard)

A nactation question.

In an earlier post

http://www.bgonline.org/forums/webbbs_config.pl?noframes;read=92869

you wrote:

"Last year, in order to get the capital letter to rise to the top significantly more often, I sophisticated the 6pt convention in a couple of ways. One way is that the closest point owned overrides the closest checker destination. (It doesn't affect backgammon opening moves, but it affects opening Nackgammon moves due to the second anchor.)"

How does this affect the S and Z? I could be tempted to make the anchor with the 2 if I saw the sequence 52S-xxx-62S in light of that information.

Messages In This Thread

• 52S-xxx-62
  Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 8:47 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 1:52 a.m.
    • 52S-xxx-62
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 4:48 p.m.
      • 52S-xxx-62
        Tommy Nesbakk -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 7:48 a.m.
        • 52S-xxx-62
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 12:33 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 10:41 a.m.
  • I remember...
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 12:42 a.m.
    • I remember...
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 3:34 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62 ***RO***
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 8:12 a.m.
    • 52S-xxx-62, Summary
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 2:30 p.m.
      • 52S-52S-62 ***RO***
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Saturday, 19 November 2011, at 7:38 p.m.