[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

52S-xxx-62, Summary

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Friday, 18 November 2011, at 2:30 p.m.

In Response To: 52S-xxx-62 ***RO*** (Dmitriy Obukhov)

White's "xxx" reply not shown


1O '1O ' '5X '3X ' ' '4O

2X ' ' ' '5O '4O ' ' '5X


My recollections of the Snowie truncs appear to be correct, and those trunc results hold up very well both to Dmitriy's XG rollouts and to XGR++ evaluations (in red font) for the rest.

    Play "Z" vs so-so priming point:
    52S-22E-62 [Z C22 r38] "++e
    52S-22N-62 [Z C34] "++e
    52S-42P-62 [Z S24 R42] “<5
    52S-44B-62 [Z C28] “<5
    52S-64P-62 [Z C53 S72] "++e

    Play "r" vs strong priming point:
    52S-11e-62 [r S17 R21 C73 Z120] “<5
    52S-31P-62 [S R1 r4 Z14] “<20**5
    52S-61P-62 [r S35] “<5

    Play "S" vs non-pointmakers:
    52S-41T-62 [S R45 Z45 r46] "++e
    52S-51S-62 [S r15 R15] "<5
    52S-52S-62 [S r24 R26] "++e
    52S-65R-62 [S r22] “<5

    Exceptions (to avoid exposing outfield blot(s) to new direct shot):
    52S-32Z-62 [R S5 r13 S20 C40]"++e
    52S-62R-62 [r Z32] “<5
    52S-63R-62 [Z $35 r52] "++e

The only legitimate-reply position of the 52S-xxx-62 type with an evaluated margin within .03 that Dmitriy did not roll out is 52S-52S-22. Granted, 52S-32Z-22 is tied, but 32Z is a terrible reply (as is 22E -- both are marked in blue).

Recapping (as stated here):

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.