BGonline.org Forums
A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Saturday, 19 November 2011, at 11:48 p.m.
In Response To: A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame (Paul Weaver)
I'd try 20/16 10/8 over 20/16 24/22 over 20/16 6/4. No idea what the fourth play that's so close is.
Messages In This Thread
- A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 19 November 2011, at 11:29 p.m.
- A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 19 November 2011, at 11:48 p.m.
- A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Mr Majestyk -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 12:47 a.m.
- A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 1:30 a.m.
- A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 6:59 a.m.
- A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 8:40 a.m.
- Rollout Result
Paul Weaver -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 5:31 p.m.
- Rollout Result
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 7:50 p.m.
- Rollout Result
Stick -- Monday, 21 November 2011, at 7:47 a.m.
- Rollout Result
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 21 November 2011, at 8:15 a.m.
- Rollout Result
leobueno -- Monday, 21 November 2011, at 10:40 p.m.
- 4ply/XGR+ Rollout
Stick -- Tuesday, 22 November 2011, at 3:12 a.m.
- All Rolls are Fortuitous
Colin Owen -- Tuesday, 22 November 2011, at 5:30 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.