| |
BGonline.org Forums
A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame
Posted By: Casper van der Tak In Response To: A Not-So-Fortuitous 42 in a Backgame (Paul Weaver)
Date: Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 8:40 a.m.
I would start with 20/16, because we need to keep flexibility and need to pumps checkers in the outfield. After that, I'd play 10/8 to create some threats against the back checker. I suppose 24/22, 6/4 and 5/3* are also OK with the 2. From Paul's post I gather that 5/3* probably won the rollout, but I would not play that OTB.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.