| |
BGonline.org Forums
OLM Tu 11/29/11
Posted By: Taper_Mike In Response To: OLM Tu 11/29/11 (Jason Lee)
Date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011, at 5:24 a.m.
The 6 is practically forced. So, I start by moving 13/7. The only alternative is to come out to White's bar point, a play I reject because it gratuitously gives White a 6 to play from the bar. That leaves four possibilities for the 1.
White is not threatening anything offensively, so I would pass on splitting the back men in favor of a move on the offensive side of the board.
- 24/23
- 10/9
- 8/7
- 6/5
Moving 10/9 is probably the weakest of them. It does almost nothing for offense. Certain rolls with a 6 would no longer make the 4pt. Instead, similar combinations with a 5 would make it. But 5 is the number that we can use to make the 8pt. Hence, 10/9 duplicates the 51 52 and 54 we might use to make the 8pt.
Leaving blots on the 8pt and 10pt gives White a hit when he rolls 64 62 53 and 44. That seems a small risk for the diversification we get when we play 6/5. Moving 8/7 is safer; it leaves only 64 to hit. But it takes away the nice 5 we have now, and fails to unstack the 6pt.
My vote: 13/7, 6/5
Mike
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.