[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

63S-21X-32 and 63S-62X-32

Posted By: Martin Sterel
Date: Sunday, 4 December 2011, at 12:01 a.m.

In Response To: 63S-21X-32 and 63S-62X-32 (Nack Ballard)

I was so quick to respond I wrote not play to 13.Has to be not play to 10.

So meant like this :

You are right.

I was having an imaginary blot from the mid on 18.So no roll just a little bit different position with another variation.Than the choice would go really to anchoring. Just as much as there is now a checker from the mid on white's 8 point(17)

I did not explain that good enough or illustrated by a new position. Now in my mind there is a too good structure for white , where blue should anchor, not play to 10. I wanted a position where the choice is clear.

So my bad for making it not clear enough.But I thought would be clear,what I meant

Martin

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.