How about a score where gammons do matter? As when I saw it I accidentally thought they did. The cube was already given as we expect we would cube a little more aggressive , making our opponent gammons worthless. And our own 0.5
Now unfortunately the cube would/should have been given in most scenario’s so it is weird to say how we would play. But since the cube would not be given at this roll , how would you play it now? I would have played bar/15 as I missed bar/ 19 11/7 which is superior . But for money if the cube was NOT given it shows bar/15 is right Again I suppose the cube would have been given along the way. Still why now bar/19?Not by much but a little according xg++
| 1. | XG Roller++ | Bar/15 | eq: +0,382 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 57,97% (G:3,61% B:0,09%)
42,03% (G:6,95% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 2. | XG Roller++ | Bar/19 11/7 | eq: +0,378 (-0,004) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 59,62% (G:3,63% B:0,09%)
40,38% (G:4,79% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 3. | 4-ply | Bar/19 8/4* | eq: +0,301 (-0,081) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 60,85% (G:3,32% B:0,07%)
39,15% (G:16,79% B:0,08%) | |
|
| 4. | 2-ply | Bar/19 6/2 | eq: +0,031 (-0,351) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 51,20% (G:3,07% B:0,10%)
48,80% (G:7,60% B:0,02%) | |
|
| 5. | 1-ply | Bar/19 7/3 | eq: -0,321 (-0,703) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 43,77% (G:2,41% B:0,10%)
56,23% (G:17,14% B:0,04%) | |
|
