BGonline.org Forums

Nactation

Posted By: Carlo Melzi
Date: Thursday, 15 December 2011, at 2:19 p.m.

In Response To: Duplication? (Carlo Melzi)

For sake of completeness, I believe the sequence should be Nactated 32D-51$-31H-31H-62

Please correct me if I am wrong, not sure about the second 31H...

Messages In This Thread

• Duplication?
  Carlo Melzi -- Thursday, 15 December 2011, at 2:02 p.m.
  • Nactation
    Carlo Melzi -- Thursday, 15 December 2011, at 2:19 p.m.
    • Nactation
      Stick -- Thursday, 15 December 2011, at 3:59 p.m.
      • Nactation of 32D-51$-31H-31
        Nack Ballard -- Friday, 16 December 2011, at 12:56 a.m.
  • Duplication?
    pontiac -- Thursday, 15 December 2011, at 2:56 p.m.
  • 32D-51$-31H-31X-62
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 15 December 2011, at 5:56 p.m.
    • 32D-51$-31H-31X-62
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 16 December 2011, at 8:28 p.m.
      • 32D-51$-31H-31X-62
        Taper_Mike -- Friday, 16 December 2011, at 9:08 p.m.
        • 32D-51$-31H-31X-62
          Taper_Mike -- Friday, 16 December 2011, at 9:53 p.m.
      • Flexibility of style letters
        Nack Ballard -- Friday, 16 December 2011, at 10:12 p.m.