BGonline.org Forums

Nactation question

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 4:03 p.m.

In Response To: Nactation question (Petter Bengtsson)

I'm sure there's a reason. I would have used 21@ to denote 23(2). Perhaps U and @ would both be correct for 23(2) leaving V for b-22.

Messages In This Thread

• 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31
  Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 9:41 a.m.
  • Nactation question
    David Rockwell -- Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 2:49 p.m.
    • Nactation question
      Stick -- Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 3:31 p.m.
    • Nactation question
      Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 3:42 p.m.
      • Nactation question
        David Rockwell -- Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 4:03 p.m.
        • Nactation question
          Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 8 January 2012, at 2:56 a.m.
      • Nactation question
        Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 8 January 2012, at 1:13 a.m.
  • 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31
    David Rockwell -- Saturday, 7 January 2012, at 2:58 p.m.
  • 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31 rollout: 4-way dead heat!
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 1:52 a.m.
    • 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31 rollout: 4-way dead heat!
      Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 4:35 a.m.
      • 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31 rollout: 4-way dead heat! (4-ply display)
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 5:29 a.m.
        • 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31 rollout: 4-way dead heat! (4-ply, even closer)
          Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 6:15 a.m.
    • 31P-64R-62O-21V-63R-31 rollout: 4-way dead heat!
      Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 9:36 a.m.