BGonline.org Forums

65R-62S-33D-63R-54D-42S-C-52P-51S-63R-21

Posted By: Michael Depreli
Date: Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:49 a.m.

In Response To: 65R-62S-33D-63R-54D-42S-C-52P-51S-63R-21 (Nack Ballard)

Nack:

This position looks like it could be reached in fewer rolls, but I guess not.

The majority of positions I post will come from matches against XG which I have set up to vary the openings and replies withing equity 0.04 so yes the sequences could be shorter.

Michael

Messages In This Thread

• Hit...but what about the deuce?
  Michael Depreli -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 3:55 p.m.
  • 65R-62S-33D-63R-54D-42S-C-52P-51S-63R-21
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 4:39 a.m.
    • 65R-62S-33D-63R-54D-42S-C-52P-51S-63R-21
      Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:49 a.m.
      • 54D-52D-52P-51R-66B-21S-C-53R-21
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 8:01 a.m.
    • 65R-62S-33D-63R-54D-42S-C-52P-51S-63R-21
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 3:53 p.m.
    • 65R-62S-33D-63R-54D-42S-C-52P-51S-63R-21
      leemo -- Sunday, 22 January 2012, at 5:49 a.m.
  • Hit...but what about the deuce?
    Svilen Dimitrov -- Friday, 20 January 2012, at 3:50 p.m.