BGonline.org Forums

RO

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 7:33 a.m.

In Response To: RO (Daniel Murphy)

There's a slight resemblance to the position here:

http://sites.google.com/site/backgammonlessons/a-lesson-from-nack-perry-and-david

The resemblance I'm thinking of is that since Blue has only a 3 prime to Red's 4 prime, if Blue plays 15/7, he's semi-committed to a prime vs. prime plan which he is not favored to win.

Messages In This Thread

• variance of example 3-13.
  Martin Sterel -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 1:04 p.m.
  • looking for explenations for top 5 plays
    Martin Sterel -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 6:20 p.m.
    • looking for explenations for top 5 plays
      Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 9:18 p.m.
      • Do not shoot te messenger pag 81"connectivity"
        Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 5:35 a.m.
        • Do not shoot te messenger pag 81"connectivity"
          Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 5:43 a.m.
          • Do not shoot te messenger pag 81"connectivity"
            Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:15 a.m.
  • 61P-66O-65D-32 and variant
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 1:10 a.m.
  • RO
    Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:14 a.m.
    • RO ps
      Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:32 a.m.
    • RO
      Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 7:23 a.m.
      • RO
        Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 7:33 a.m.
      • RO
        Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 8:00 a.m.
    • 61P-66O-65D-32 -- 5k rollout of UW
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 20 January 2012, at 4:27 a.m.
      • 61P-66O-65D-32 -- 5k rollout of UW
        Martin Sterel -- Friday, 20 January 2012, at 6:07 p.m.