| |
BGonline.org Forums
Trivial take, but is it still a double?
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: Trivial take, but is it still a double? (Chuck Bower)
Date: Wednesday, 26 September 2007, at 4:03 p.m.
Sorry, I thought White was doubling you. Now that WOULD be juicy beaver!
Gammonless takepoint is a bit higher than $ at this score. If you blot and get hit, White may want to play on which argues even more for this being an earlier doubling opportunity than at $-play.
So if it's close at $-play (which I think it is) then it should be a double here. And if it's not a close decision at $-play it must be a double there, making this an even bigger cube.
I double.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.