BGonline.org Forums

A better radar

Posted By: Henrik Bukkjaer
Date: Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 1:07 a.m.

In Response To: A better radar (neilkaz)

In the DBgF we use 1st pass XGR++ Gigantic - for both sides - when we review matches for bot-norm.

If I'm pressed for time, I only analyze the player seeking the norm at that level. Then, if the PR turns out to be close to the required level, I do both sides XGR++ Gigantic. It's possible to find some double-errors by going deeper on the opponents response, simply because even the Gigantic filters doesn't go "wide" enough, to spot all errors on XGR++.

I actually had a 17-point match for review recently, where the target for that player was PR 3.50, and he came in at 3.49 if the opponent was just analyzed W/C, but 3,51 if the opponent was analyzed XGR++ Gigantic as well :-)

On a very fast computer, XGR++Gig takes just about the same time, as it takes to play the match (live).

Messages In This Thread

• Best Play Not on XG's Radar, #18
  Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 11 February 2012, at 2:59 p.m.
  • A better radar
    neilkaz -- Saturday, 11 February 2012, at 4:28 p.m.
    • A better radar
      Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 11 February 2012, at 4:46 p.m.
      • A better radar
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 11 February 2012, at 9:32 p.m.
        • A better radar
          Taper_Mike -- Monday, 13 February 2012, at 3:47 a.m.
          • A better radar
            neilkaz -- Monday, 13 February 2012, at 4:38 p.m.
            • XGR+(+)
              mtuhtan -- Monday, 13 February 2012, at 6:10 p.m.
        • A better radar
          Henrik Bukkjaer -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 1:07 a.m.