[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

3-digits versus 4-digits

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Monday, 12 March 2012, at 10:09 p.m.

In Response To: 65R-31P-41T-62, another rollout (Nack Ballard)

–

For most positions, 3 digits are sufficient in nacbracs. For rollouts, however, my preference is to display 4 digits. Of late, I have been posting 3-digit nacbracs above my 4-digit rollouts. See, for instance, this rollout of 42P-64P-53. For those of us who do not have access to the original XG files, I think it’s a happy compromise.

The advantage to displaying 4 digits comes when rollouts are combined. Nack’s computation of the aggregate nacbrac for 65R-31P-41T-62 is a case in point. I suspect that a fourth digit would make the calculation more accurate.

Nack, if you see this, please comment on your experiences. You are in a position to know whether a fourth digit improves accuracy when rollouts are combined.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.