[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Correction — Nactation: Question on P

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Thursday, 16 August 2012, at 10:38 a.m.

In Response To: Correction — Nactation: Question on P (storm)

–


2O '2X2X2X3X2X2X '1X ' '

5O4O ' '2O2O ' ' ' ' '1X
The P (Point) family is empty.

Mike: Either 6/2 or 5/1 can be coupled with a point-switching maneuver to produce a valid member of the P (Point) family.

Storm: Doesn't this go against the rule you cite as the Dedication Clause ?

Of course it does. So the P (Point) family is empty.

When I realized [6/4(2) 5/1] and [6/2 5/3(2)] were possible, it meant that [6/4(2) 5/3(2)] was not forced, and therefore could not be in the P (Point) family. Upset that I had posted an obvious mistake, I rushed to correct it...

... but compounded it instead. ;)

Thanks for straightening me out!

Mike

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.